Occasional Songs

a new piece once in awhile

Category: Death

Requiem.

cb2e0c62224bfb41474137fe_Li_Lingzi

 

The Chinese are, by nature, a little secretive. My husband had to tell his mother he’d gotten divorced (three years before) so that he could tell her he was getting married again. She didn’t tell him that she’d lost a son in China; Gong, age 4.  Elmer frequently does not want me to tell things that matter so little that it is a bigger deal to not tell them than to tell them.

So I was understanding but exasperated when I learned that the family of the Chinese graduate student killed at the Boston Marathon on Monday did not want her personal details released.

But the dead belong to the universe, they are no longer under anyone’s control. They are of us, and we are of them. This young woman deserves to be mourned alongside 8-year-old Martin Richard and 29-year-old Krystle Campbell. Her death demands acknowledgement.

Meet Lu Lingzi. “Lu” is her family name, and because the Chinese regard it as such, this makes her a cousin to my son and my husband, who share the same last name. (It matters not the spelling, it is all the same character.) She was a Master’s Degree candidate in Math and Statistics at Boston University, and had just started there this fall, after graduating from Beijing Institute of Technology last year. She’d been a volunteer for UNESCO at a World Heritage Site, and had gone to to the Yucai school for high school, and graduated in 20o8. I think that makes her 23. 48a285adb4fee6b05c632cc0_2

She had a profile on Linked in and another on Facebook. I expect those will disappear soon, when her parents have surfaced from their awful grief, as much as any parent ever does.

She’d gone down to the finish line to watch the race with two friends, Zhou Danling, who was injured and another student who escaped unharmed. They could have watched it from Kenmore Square, that’s much closer to B.U. But the cheering isn’t as loud there, there’s not the banners and flags and joyous conclusion to the grueling race.

Lingzi Lu liked The Economist and Disneyland; Lindt Chocolates, and Seiji Ozawa’s rendition of Beethoven’s 5th Symphony. She’d noted a pair of Naturalizer shoes called “Bewitched” and some Betsey Johnson eyeglasses.

She played Candy Crush online and had reached Level 77. On Facebook, she had 148 friends. There she wrote that she loved the Charles River at night. Me too, I loved the Charles River at night, so inky and mysterious, a ribbon rippling through the city; a strangely peaceful place.

Her friends called her Dorothy.

Godspeed, Dorothy.

希望她美丽的灵魂在天堂好好安息.

 

 

Fighting Dirty

Why Animal Rights Activists Can’t Resist the Personal Attack.

What’s startling is how ugly they are, and how quickly they get that way. You’d think people who purport to love animals would be  reasonably companionable with each other, but if you thought that, you’d be wrong. If you aren’t in lockstep with the beliefs of the Animal Rights crowd, well clearly you then are one of the “exploiters”, with a puppy mill in your backyard or veal calves stacked to the rafters in your suburban garage. Common sense never enters the picture.

Sometimes it’s almost laughable. In the online comment section to any news story about the abuse and death of a dog or cat, you will read suggestions that the same fate should befall the abuser, which is simply an utter failure in logic. Often those suggesting the mutilation, starvation and imprisonment and/or death of the sorry human responsible for said abuse are the fervent supporters of Ingrid Newkirk, the founder of PeTA, who famously wrote “A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy.”  They see no distinction between animals and humans, and indeed rail against the human “enslavement” of animals as companions or livestock. What we consider responsible stewardship, they shamelessly compare to the Holocaust.

But it isn’t just the PeTA faithful, it’s also the ever-declining legion of supporters of the Humane Society of the United States, which not a “Humane Society” at all, but a fundraising machine; a group of lobbyists that like to posture as some kind of quasi-governmental agency regarding animals. Because they repeatedly present themselves as experts, the media often turn to them in instances of crises involving animals, perpetuating the myth that HSUS knows anything about animals. Really, anything at all. They do know how to influence politicians, though. They seem to be quite good at that.

Through the efforts of many, the public is gradually becoming more aware that HSUS only shares less than one percent of their hundred million dollars in annual donations with any kind of local animal shelter. They do offer consultations for shelters– for $30,000 a pop.  There is a dawning awareness that some of the “raids” HSUS engages in are more for the television cameras than anything else. Worse, those animals are often rescued to death, shuttled off from their mediocre home to a high-kill shelter where they subsequently “disappear.”

News agencies are starting to figure it out, though one account from an Atlanta television station was so thoroughly surpressed by litigators from HSUS, that video is now only viewable through a hosting site in Tehran. Here’s the link.  The public was understandably confused and outraged with HSUS’ president, Wayne Pacelle, suggested that notorious dog-torturer Michael Vick deserved to have more dogs, especially as Pacelle offered his comments immediately following the receipt of a $10,000 contribution made by the Philadelphia Eagles to HSUS.

But beyond Wayne Pacelle in his silk suits, there is an enormous cadre of employees and interns at the group’s posh suburban Washington DC campus. (But to be sure, there’s no animal shelter there.) And HSUS has something else, something in common with PeTA.  They have shills. These are people that aren’t paid by HSUS or PeTA; they volunteer. Everyday they comb the internet looking for material related to “their” organization, eager to sing the praises of the group, or sling mud in defending it.

It doesn’t matter how reasonable an argument is presented to them. You can tell them until you’re blue in the face that “cage free” chickens are crowded into poultry barns and suffer more injury, disease and death than their counterparts in cages. (“Pecking order” means something, obviously.) You can patiently explain the time and effort and expense it takes to produce a nicely-bred puppy. You can question what happens to those dogs and cats seized in raids. When they have exhausted the party line (and that happens pretty quickly) they turn on the offensive, and out come the personal attacks.

God forbid that you raise animals of any sort. They will say that you are “exploiting” animals. It doesn’t matter that animal husbandry is largely a labor of love; certainly no one gets rich from it. To hear the “faithful” tell it, we’re all rolling around in Cadillacs off the blood money from puppy sales. It doesn’t matter that I haven’t sold a puppy in five years, I’ve been called a liar, a puppy  miller, and a “miserable old bitch.” They sling condescension and insults and invective faster than a fry cook flips pancakes on a Saturday morning.

But it’s never limited to just that arena. Oh no, they come after you tooth and nail wherever they can find you. They try to free your “imprisoned” dogs at dogs shows. They vandalize fur stores. They make threats, both veiled and outright against prominent citizens who dare to tell the truth.  David Martosko, the former director of Humanewatch, (an ad hoc group of 440,000 individuals united in revealing the the truth about HSUS ) was subject to the most extraordinary character defamation, including the publication of fabricated arrest records, videos and a website devoted to his downfall . . . and he did, finally, give up.

Or Douglas Anthony Cooper, an affable-enough Canadian novelist who has been smeared repeatedly in a number of blogs by one crazy cat-hating woman (“cats kill the elderly,” “litter boxes make you insane”)  posing as several different people. Not just smeared, libeled, his attorney said. Just this week, Cooper’s Wikipedia entry has been repeatedly hacked, vandalized and finally flagged for not being “notable enough.” Why? Because one of the most troll-like of the shills doesn’t like what Douglas Anthony Cooper has been writing about on Huffington Post.

Well, goodness, you say, what has Douglas Anthony Cooper been writing about? The business model of dog fighting, perhaps? How to breed more kittens for fun and profit? No. Douglas Anthony Cooper has been writing about PeTA; and he has been promoting the idea of the No Kill movement.

And that my friend, is the key.

For the longest time, I couldn’t understand why people who claim to love animals could support PeTA or HSUS. PeTA maintains a “shelter” in Norfolk, Virginia which kills 97 percent of the animals that come through its doors. (This is verified through their own reports to the Commonwealth of Virginia.) HSUS doesn’t maintain any shelters, but they certainly support the killing. But finally, I get it : those people that support PeTA and HSUS are so shrill and so nasty and so vengeful because-

They cannot bear to hear the truth.

This argument in fact, has split the entire “shelter” community. Those advocating for No Kill don’t understand why the killing can’t stop. Those killing either don’t have the strength to shift the bureaucracies that keep them locked in the same old behavior, or they lack the courage to invoke change.

Many people who work in or support “shelters” that kill for convenience will adamantly tell you that they have to kill all those old dogs, young dogs, newborn puppies, fluffy kittens, big fat housecats, pitbulls (or dogs that just look like pitbulls) and “feral” cats. They have to kill them because there are just not enough homes. (Not true, pet overpopulation is a myth.) They have to kill them because they are sneezing. (No, they’re not joking.) They have to kill them because there’s no space. (Even if someone is coming from a rescue for that very dog.) They have to kill them because no one wants black dogs. (So they say.) They have to kill them because suitable adopters haven’t turned up in the dogs’ 3-day tenure– others would rather kill a cat than adopt it out to someone who might let it outside. They have to kill because they can’t be bothered to stop the killing.

And whose fault is it that they have to kill? Why, yours and mine and all the rest of the bad, irresponsible public of course. If you’re involved with purebred dogs, or if you even own sexually-intact dogs, then of course, you’re part of the problem.  Never mind that puppies born to responsible breeders are the dogs least likely to end up in any shelter. But what of the dogs that are “dumped” in shelters?  People take their pets to shelters when they can’t keep them anymore because they’ve been educated to think that’s the purpose of a “shelter” – to help find new homes for pets.

The cruel fact of the matter is that many owner surrendered animals are dead before their owner leaves the parking lot. Dogs and cats and bunnies and hamsters end up in shelters because they get lost, their owners die or go into a nursing home, their owners are deployed in the military, people hit a rough patch in their lives and go to homeless shelters or public housing where pets are not allowed. And yes, some dogs do get “dumped” in “shelters,” by people who weren’t the greatest owners who perhaps foolishly hope that their dog will get a better home the next time around. A dog tied to a parking meter has a better chance of surviving. Unless some good samaritan unwittingly takes it to a high-kill shelter.

In her blog, Yes Biscuit, Shirley Thistlethwaite examines the problems in contemporary animal sheltering, particularly at the deplorable Memphis Animal Shelter, and she never stops asking why it can’t be different. An extraordinarily brave woman, she does not shrink from identifying the worst offenders, and of course, she is also roundly despised by the minions of PeTA and HSUS.

The idea of a shelter that seeks to re-home every adoptable pet isn’t a new one. For a long time, it might have been a magical fairy tale. The shelters would get over-crowded, they said. The shelters would turn away all but the “cute” animals, they said. The shelters would keep alive animals that ought to be mercifully dispatched, they said. It would be bad for the animals. That’s what they said.

Then a man named Nathan Winograd came along and showed that in fact, an open admission No Kill shelter can and does work. He even wrote a manual on how to do it, Redemption. “No Kill” is a workable model, and it saves money and heartache all around. Not to mention lives. It saves lives.

You’d think that Nathan would be much beloved by everyone in the animal sheltering world. He’s the kind of guy that rescues insects in peril. He’s a vegan. He had demonstrated that there is a home for every animal and that the “shelter” killing that goes on in such repulsive numbers in this country isn’t necessary, that there’s another way. But no, he’s the most vilified of all. HSUS and PeTA fans alike are united in their loathing for this modern day St. Francis.

No Kill shelters work because they have less staff turnover and less volunteer burnout. The public is happier to visit a shelter where they know that every animal they don’t choose isn’t facing imminent death. Businesses are eager to partner with No Kill shelters. Yes, it requires extra work and creativity and thinking outside the box. It might require a relaxation of adoption requirements or perhaps less expensive adoption fees. (But hey, you’re saving on all that money not having to buy thousands of vials of Fatal-Plus! And your landfill charges are significantly reduced.)

It can only work if the community gets involved. And in communities across America, there are now 51 successful Open-Admission Municipal No Kill shelters. True shelters. These are shelters that accept every animal that comes through the door and works to find that animal a home. Some of these shelters are in the poorest areas of the country, but they are trying this and they are succeeding.

Shelters everywhere could start by having increased adoption hours. They could have intervention programs that help people keep their pets rather than surrender them. They could work in tandem with specific breed rescues. They can offer reduced cost spay and neuter programs.  They can network pets over the internet. They can stop having arbitrary days when they simply kill to clear the kennel.

But the powers that be have to want to make that choice. Too many of them stubbornly say it can’t work, it won’t work. Even when the evidence says otherwise, they simply will not try. Their supporters instead tell us that we don’t know what it’s like to kill hundreds of animals (and thank God, I have to admit that part is true). They will say that we don’t understand how hard they work, and how awful it is, but that it’s necessary because — line up for the chorus now– the irresponsible public makes it necessary.

But No Kill advocates do understand. They believe that all of that hard work, all that soul searching, would be better served in finding homes for animals, rather than bagging them their bodies. Dry your tears, shelter workers, and come into the light.

Now I suppose there are some sociopaths who truly like to kill animals. But let’s set those people aside for a minute and just think about the average person who works in a shelter, killing puppies and kittens and dogs and cats who simply aren’t adopted. You know the animals: they’re too young, too old, they’re starving and showed food-guarding tendencies, they’re frightened and they growled out of fear. They have some imminently treatable issue like mange or kennel cough or upper respiratory infection. They are deemed not suitable for adoption by the excuse of the day.

Why wouldn’t those people at least want to try?

Why are they so damned determined to justify the killing that they attack Nathan Winograd and Douglas Anthony Cooper, and Shirley Thistlethwaite and the good folks at No Kill Nation and No Kill Advocacy Center and No Kill Coalition,  and No Kill Revolution and No Kill Miami, No Kill Louisville, No Kill New York— indeed they attack anyone and everyone who suggests that we can find homes for every pet that needs one.

Here’s why: because if they accept that these dogs and puppies, cats and kittens don’t ever need to be killed,  then they also have to accept that they’ve been needlessly killing animals.

Who could live with that?  (Okay, yes, I guess a sociopath could live with that.) But for these ordinary people who’ve bought the party line for so long, that would be devastating. Once you accept that the killing really wasn’t necessary, that it isn’t really the “bad public” that forces you to kill, then you have to take responsibility for all that death.

It’s not just those in the kill room who are stained; it’s everyone that makes the excuses, it’s everyone who tries to justify why death is a better choice. PeTA and HSUS maintain that death is a better choice because they each have an agenda to “free” domesticated animals from human bondage. You don’t have to go on believing the party line, you don’t have to defend them. They’re not really for the animals. They’ve never been for the animals.

I understand why these people are shrill. If I’d been doing what they’d been doing, I wouldn’t want to have to come to terms with that much blood on my hands either. I wish they’d just listen for a minute, and see that they have a way out.

A Chinese Funeral in L.A.

She sent jellybeans at Christmas. We finish the last of them crossing Nevada two weeks later. We are driving to L.A. for her funeral.

“These are good,” my husband says, “where did they come from?”

“Your mother sent them at Christmas.”

He doesn’t reply and when I look over he is gazing out the window.  It is very quiet in the car, just the hum of the road and the small murmurs of our 15-month old son asleep in his car seat. No more jellybeans at Christmas, no boxes of bean thread and dried mushrooms, no red envelopes.  I will never again hear my husband on the telephone with his mother, laughing in the charivari of their country dialect Cantonese.

It was not that her death was unexpected, but still we were startled by it, our vibrant Saturday morning suddenly cracked and strange. In all truth, it was a good death. To be ninety-three, to eat a breakfast of rice porridge with your eldest daughter in your own house, to retire to your Naugahyde recliner for a nap, to never wake up. This was an event we had long expected and yet, it was surreal, a pretense. We had promised to take Julian to meet his grandmother, his Yen-Yen, at Chinese New Year. How could that mean nothing now?

No one had told us that Chinese New Year would be too late. My husband is the youngest, and the only child  living out of California. Our life in Montana is nearly as removed from L.A. as her life had been, long ago, in Kwong-Jow. He called each week and his mother put on her bravest, strongest voice. She did not tell Elmer that she had not left the house for a long time. She did not say that she would not live to meet her youngest grandson.

We arrive at her house, bedraggled and road-worn. It has taken us five hours to travel the last fifty miles from San Bernardino to Hollywood. Elmer’s brother Norman is standing on the sidewalk, wearing a black suit, smoking a cigarette. The others are inside, waiting. I lift Julian, sleeping, out of the car and carry him up the steps. His shirt is stained with apple juice. The living room is very bright and crowded with many Chinese relatives, all in black. There is a pervasive odor. I remember it from my Aunt Lillie’s, the smell of urine and death.

They have all just returned from the wake. We are startled by this, and embarrassed not to have arrived in time, but we have been on the road for two days and not privy to all the details.

The eldest brother, Tony, comes in the front door.  He has been estranged from the family, “married” to a succession of Latin women; the most recent wife trails behind him with their four-year-old daughter in arms. She and the girl are terribly shy. It is awkward, this situation. Tony, so long gone and by his own choice set apart, is by tradition, in charge.  He has even given up the family name and chosen another. There are resentments, some voiced, most swallowed.  I don’t think Tony wants the honor, but to refuse it would be unforgivably disrespectful.

“Has anyone heard from Elmer. Where is he?” he asks.

“Why don’t you ask him yourself? He’s right behind you.” The oldest son and the youngest embrace.  Tony yanks on Elmer’s ponytail and waves him away.

“Oh, I don’t talk to people with long hair.” He is only half-kidding, this family renegade, this Mexican brother.

Our son stares at his Chinese relatives. He has never met them before and they are delighted with him. He is bashful. I feel bashful too, in my jeans and Doc Martens,  disheveled.  We had planned to stay here, in this, her house, tonight and all the nights we need to be in L.A. Elmer had even asked if it would be all right.  Now that we are here, it appears that it is not all right, that all of the sheets and towels and blankets have been given away, thrown away, disposed of in accordance with custom. The possibility of finding a reasonable  hotel in L.A. at eight o’clock on a Friday night is bleak. It is so bright and so loud in this room. I worry that my navy blue suit will not be appropriate after all. I worry that we won’t find a place to lay our heads.

May, the eldest, a tiny sparrow of a woman is explaining to us the contents of a K-Mart bag.  The black ribbons are arm bands for Elmer and for Julian. The yarn bows on bobby pins are for me. The white one is for the funeral, the blue one for three days after, the red one for the official thirty days of mourning.  There are extra yarn bows, green and red for Elmer’s two older and absent children. After the funeral, she explains, I am to take the white one out of my hair and throw it into the grave. I am to replace it with the blue bow. I am to throw in the green bows for Tai and Camille.  The arm bands go into the grave too. I am struck by the image  of Chinese graves strewn with bits of yarn and  bobby pins.

A crate has been brought into the center of the room. Julian is banging on the top of it. The lid lifted reveals a canvas skin covering a lacquered trunk.  This trunk came from China, in 1937. On one of the fast boats, an eighteen day crossing for a pregnant 34-year-old woman with her 12-year-old daughter, eight-year-old son, two toddlers and the ghosts of the two she lost.

Her marriage had been arranged when she was 14, and she was married to Pon Lieu at 20. It was a good match. He was not old or  ugly. He had prospects in America.  Under U.S. foreign policy, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 forbade the immigration of Chinese women until 1930, when “Chinese wives of certain American citizens” were permitted entry.  In 1937, with China under threat of Japanese invasion, Pon Lieu was allowed to bring his family to California.

Los Angeles must have seemed like another planet. There was of course Chinatown, a colony of the familiar, but they settled instead on Clanton Street and then later on 28th Street, deep in the heart of South Central L.A. She worked at home embroidering silk ties, while he was employed as a succession of Chinese restaurants and then, during the war, as a boiler maker in the shipyards. Her name was Moy Kee, its literal translation “Rose,” her American name, never spoken.  Her real name, the one in our hearts, was “Ma.” She gave birth to three more children, all boys.  Each time they were delivered at  home by a woman physician, a pioneer in obstetrics, who bestowed on the sons not only easier passage into this world, but their uniquely American names: Norris, Norman, Elmer.

May lifts a tiny white dress from the trunk. This was Wayne’s. Here is a wooden stamp with the Chinese character of the family name.  Here are traditional dresses, the cheung-sahm, and pajamas and blouses and western dresses. They are all very dainty as if they might have belonged to a delicate child. They were Ma’s.

“Oh look, I remember carrying Elmer around in this when he was a baby.” The younger sister, also named Rose, lifts out an ornately embroidered square of fabric with ties at each corner. “He was so heavy. Of course, I was only ten years old.”

There is a plainer square and the older sister points to it and says to Rose, “Well, I carried you in this one, and Wayne, and Norris too.”

There are 26 people in this room, spilling out onto the steps, to the driveway. I keep looking for Ma to appear in the hallway or from the kitchen. She is everywhere here: in the anniversary embroidery hanging over the lumpy sofa, in the faces of the children whose photographs grace the mantel. She is in the ornate glass window over the buffet, and in the abundance of imported candy spilling over the flats of soda. She is in the 20 dozen rice bowls that fill the cupboards, and in the Birds of Paradise blooming riotously outside her door.  She should be sitting at the end of the long dining table, presiding over all, and laughing.

At an end table, Julian is plucking petals from flowers in an elaborate bouquet. Clearly, they are not from a Chinese florist. The flowers are a Western arrangement of roses and lilies, and in the Western tradition of giving flowers to the family.  Elmer’s employers had sent them. The siblings are touched by this gesture, this display of sympathy for the living. The Chinese give their flowers to the dead.

After promising solemnly to be back by eleven in the morning, we are  permitted to slip away from the  bright and stifling house into the January night, Bible black, scented with jasmine.  We are back in the car, driving, driving, out through Glendale and Pasadena and San Dimas. One of the relatives, a nephew, has offered us refuge in his pool house.

It seems we have just fallen into fitful sleep when morning is upon us. Still road-weary and stiff, we struggle into funeral attire. Hosiery and heels are foreign and uncomfortable; my husband has to knot his tie three times.  The baby is fussy in his little corduroy suit. These are not clothes we wear in Montana.

We get elaborate directions from the relatives to the nearest car wash. Our aged Mercedes is covered in road grime and to arrive in a dirty car would not show proper respect.

This car wash is an enormous enterprise: gas station, detail shop, wash bays, Mexican fast food, ice cream and gifts. There are thirty men in white jumpsuits attending to the line of Jeeps, Volvos and Acuras.  We pay ten dollars to an attendant and carry the baby inside to wait. It smells of taco meat inside the building. I can’t tell if it lingers from the night before or if this is something Southern Californians have for breakfast.  Elmer has found the coffee stand and brings me a little Styrofoam cup of cappuccino. Julian is fascinated with a display of air fresheners, hundreds of little trees that smell like lemon and strawberry and coconut. There is a viewing area, with plastic palm trees and gumball machines where we go to watch our car. It travels briskly through the wash process and out front to where a Latin man dries it with a multitude of towels. Every last surface is diligently polished and polished and polished.  My feet hurt. Elmer looks at his watch, frowning. It is after ten-thirty, and if the freeways are clear, the drive takes twenty minutes.  Finally we convince the car’s attendant that he has done a fine job, very satisfactory, muches gracias, we have to leave, really, it’s fine, gracias, and we go.

They are all waiting for us. May has hung a black wreath on the front door. It is a straw wreath, covered in black ribbon, nearly invisible against the black wrought iron of the security gate. On the sidewalk, Elmer’s thrice-tied patterned necktie is examined. There is a little bit of red, a russet red, in the pattern. Red cannot be worn. Red is the color of celebration. Norman has an extra tie.

“I thought this might happen, so I brought two.” Did he think that Elmer might wear the wrong tie, or just that someone would? He doesn’t elaborate. The tie has to be changed before we can enter the house.

The food has just been delivered from Ma’s favorite restaurant, Point Dume. The woman who brought it to the house is weeping, hysterical. She knew she was bringing the traditional funeral breakfast, but she did not know she was bringing it to the house of the dead. She demands “lucky money” so that she will be protected from the wrath of the spirits, and it is given to her. Norris pats her shoulder as she hurries down the steps, clutching the red envelope.

We have all been given a last packet of “lucky money.” Every year on her birthday, Ma gave each of us a red envelope with two crisp dollar bills. They  had to be pristine. She always asked the bank for new bills. Today the packets have only a single dollar in them, and some are wrinkled.

Foil containers sit  open on the table. There is a fried sea bass and boiled chicken, some steamed pork, an enormous amount of rice. I notice a chicken’s foot, the fish’s head.

“This is the traditional food to be eaten by the family prior to the funeral,” explains May. “Eating the head and tail of the animal is to show the beginning and the end.”  The alpha and the omega. The pig’s head is not evident. Perhaps the tail is there, I don’t examine the meat too closely.

Norris’ wife, Irene, eats the head of the bass. “Remember when Dad always used to want the head of the chicken. That was his favorite.”

There is a commotion at the door, women coming in amidst clamorous greetings. They are not Chinese. We don’t know them, but Norris explains that these women will be staying at the house during the funeral. They will be here to open the doors.

The limousines have arrived. Elmer and I argue quietly about Julian’s car seat. He assures me that the limousines will go sedately, and not on the freeways. He is wrong. We careen down the Ventura Highway, the baby held fast against me, my mouth in a tight smile. “Uncle” Stephen, who is really our brother-in-law, notes that he and I are both wearing dark blue suits.

“I didn’t have a black suit.” He grins.

“Me either.” The limo swerves between an IKEA delivery van and a Cadillac. There are five of us crowded into the back of this limousine, it feels as small and vulnerable as a compact car.  Fewer limousines mean less cost. I wish I had driven myself and Julian in our dignified old sedan, never mind being supportive. The driver looks to be about 12 years old. When we arrive at the Wah Wing Sang Funeral Corporation, Gutierrez and Weber Funeral Home, on Sunset Boulevard, I resist the urge to kiss the earth. Not that there is any earth to kiss, just another L.A. parking lot.

We are lined up outside the doors in order of importance.  In  a small break with tradition, husbands and wives are allowed to remain together.  The sons line up, oldest first, the youngest last. Then the daughters. Grandsons and granddaughters fill out the ranks. Tony’s oldest daughter, Erica, is not here in time for the procession. The sun beats down mercilessly on us in our funeral weeds.

At last the doors open with a blast of chilled air and the sick-sweet smell of overripe blossoms and disinfectant. We proceed through the foyer into a large room filled with metal banquet chairs. At one end is the casket. It is open.

Silently, we wait in line. Each wall of the room is lined with enormous floral offerings. Each arrangement is six feet square, a polystyrene form covered with blossoms and a long streamer offering beatification in Chinese and English. One of them was ordered on our behalf by the brothers and sisters. It is heart-shaped and covered with red carnations. Two fist-sized purple orchids adorn the left lobe, a dozen yellow roses cascade down the right side. Norris will tell us later that as I had no Chinese name, they chose a Cantonese homonym that meant “beautiful ability” and that’s what is scrolled on the snowy ribbons flowing from the heart.

Our turn comes to face the dead. The figure in the casket might be made of wax. Her skin is brown and smooth as a pecan, the laugh lines and crows’ feet fallen away with the forces of gravity and the embalmer’s art.  Her hair, once black and shiny as a raven’s wing, is brushed off her forehead like dry gray grass. She is not wearing her glasses. A worn leather Bible has been propped in her hands. She would be all the wintry hues, but for her cheung-sahm. She is clothed in the vibrant blue of the peacock’s tail, of the Caribbean sea, of summer sky from her tiny chin to her delicate ankles.

The Buddhist Chinese have a tradition in which each grandchild brings a square of silk to lay upon the body of his Yen-Yen, to keep her warm on the journey to heaven. It seems such a tender and gracious ritual, I feel desperately sad that Ma’s conversion to Christianity has deprived her of this gift.

We are being watched, by those behind us in the line who are anxious for something to look at, by the brothers before us, seated and waiting. I bow my head and murmur, wondering should I cross myself? Should I bob before the casket, that funny half-kneel, half-curtsy?  No one in line before me had done so, but this browsing seems inadequate, like passing a museum case that holds little interest.

The seating order is precise and rigid. The immediate family sits in an alcove, shadowed by more flowers, an abundance of orchids, a profusion of roses. The grownup grandchildren are  lined up in banquet chairs in front of the casket, like pews before the altar. At the back of the room, the funeral home seats the others: aunts, cousins, brothers-in-law, friends, fellow emigres from her village.

Tony sits in the front row, orchestrating the seating of his grandchildren. He is signaling to the blond wife of his oldest son that she should sit further back so that there will be place of honor left for his as-yet-absent daughter, Erica. There is much fervent gesticulating and it is met only with the gentle shake of heads, from children long accustomed to the whims of their capricious father.  This silent argument ends with the flurry of Erica’s arrival. She is the last to enter this airless room, clearly not giving a damn for old and tattered customs, coming only to say goodbye to a grandmother she loved. She sits down with the cousins.

An assistant from the Funeral Corporation comes over and speaks to Tony and to Wayne. Wayne is the middle son, the youngest to come on the boat from China. He is a lifelong bachelor. This last decade he has looked after his mother and her real estate interests, driving over a few times a week from  his apartment on Long Beach.  Often the decisions in her life have fallen to him, and he is used to being in charge. Deferring to Tony, so long absent, is very difficult.

“Would it be all right for this lady to sit with the family?” the assistant asks, gesturing toward a frail, white-haired lady sitting in the back row. The woman is Ma’s oldest friend, Hahn-gahn mo, and is related in some complicated way by marriage.

“Yes,” says Tony, “it would be fine.”

Wayne objects.

“This area is for Family only.” Hissed remarks pass between the brothers. The auntie stays where she is seated. I wish Wayne had put compassion before pride. Had Tony refused the lady, Wayne would have argued otherwise.

The minister has come from True Light Chinese Presbyterian Church. He describes Ma’s faith, but his description falls short. Each Sunday, she spent four hours navigating the public transit system, two to attend services and two hours getting home. She looked all her life to God to give her strength, and she was strong. The minister reads the 90th psalm, Mose’s dark vision of God’s wrath. It is long and grim and sad and when he reaches the end, he begins it again, this time in Cantonese.

The banquet chairs are cold and hard. Behind the lectern on an easel is a poster-sized photograph of Rose Louie Lieu, taken more than a dozen years ago on her 80th birthday.  You can’t see her smiling eyes for the glare of her cat’s eye glasses. The picture is lavishly framed with carnations, in pale blue and white. I count the flamboyant floral arrangements that line the walls on easels, shifting slightly in my chair to see the ones behind us. There are 22, a blanket of carnations over the casket and a lonely basket of mums and roses (from a Western florist) at the foot of the podium. Julian is fidgeting in his father’s lap, kicking the back of an uncle’s chair.

The minister speaks in English now telling us all again the familiar tales of Ma’s life. The good fortune of seven healthy children, the years of labor, her struggle in the new world, the family’s corner grocery, citizenship.  There are also stories that are new to us. We didn’t know that she had been an accomplished athlete in the 1920s, and that she loved volleyball. We hadn’t heard how she accosted a shoplifter in their little grocery by greeting her enthusiastically and in her embrace,  heartily hitting the coat pocket where the woman had hidden some eggs. The minister tells of her fondness of trips and names the places she visited with her senior group. Her favorite, Las Vegas, is conspicuously not mentioned.

When the Reverend recounts Ma’s frequent use of the phrase “Heckla,” a wave of laughter ripples across the room. Each one of us remembers. “Heckla” means have you eaten enough, let me care for you, take these gifts from me. Eat more. It means I love you. It should have been Ma’s epitaph.

He numbers her children and the grandchildren, each a blessing and an accomplishment. He is, unknowingly, two short in counting the children. There was a baby still-born in the spring of 1935, never named, never known.  And a four-year-old boy, Gong, who died that same cold, wet spring. Named, known, loved and never, ever mentioned.  Ma’s sorrows were her own, never shared. But in this, the accounting of her life, surely she should be honored for having borne the shattering, white-hot grief of a mother who has buried her children.

Julian is squirming and fussing, so I scoop him out of his father’s arms and hurriedly step out in to the lobby. When the doors open, the attendants jump to their feet, expecting the procession to the hearse. I shake my head. They look at their watches.

“Is this funeral running longer?” I ask them.

“Oh yes, mostly they are only twenty minutes.” This has been an hour.

“Well, she had a long and full life,” I offer by way of explanation and sit down with them on the little vinyl sofa. The woman assistant hands Julian a piece of candy. She is wearing a gold and white blouse with a little red flourish running throughout. She is not Chinese.

Up on the wall, a black program board spells out the day’s business in white plastic letters. Ma is the second Mrs. Lieu eulogized here this morning.  Mrs. Chung Lung Liu’s services were at 8:30. I wonder if she got more than twenty minutes.

The doors fly open and the casket comes rolling out on its bier under the white-gloved hands of the pall-bearers. The grandsons expected this duty, but the funeral director said it was not a task for family members, engendering a panicked search for able-bodied friends. There is the husband of one of the brother’s former girlfriends, and an old high school beau of one of the sisters. Another is a man from Ma’s village, perilously near her in age. The laconic staff has sprung into action, opening doors, starting the limos, ushering, herding, handing out small packets to each mourner.

Each packet contains a Brach’s butterscotch disc to sweeten our sorrow, and two coins wrapped separately in paper. There is a quarter wrapped in red paper and a dime wrapped in white.  We are to spend them on something sweet. We are not to take them into Ma’s house. Elmer and Julian and I will pool ours to make a bet on “Alpride” in the San Gorgonio Handicap at Santa Anita the next day. He will lose.

In the parking lot, we gather in small groups. Introductions and handshakes exchanged, the baby admired.

“Nehouma?” we are asked and answer “Fine, we are fine, thank you for coming .” Aunties and cousins embrace us, lightly touching our faces. Ma’s nurse, a young and beautiful woman from Central America tells me how treasured were the snapshots of Julian, how delighted Ma was by them. Later, Elmer and I stand with his nephews watching Tony flirt with the nurse. If only he had realized, Tony grins, he would have visited more. She smiles politely and turns away.

The funeral procession is led by a white Chevrolet El Camino, its bed loaded with the floral arrangements, easels and all. The carnation-ringed photograph is propped up so that passers-by can see who is being so honored. It seems she is looking back at us.

The limos sweep out onto Sunset Boulevard and head west towards Hollywood. This end of Sunset Boulevard, renamed to honor Caesar Chavez, is lined with Bodegas,  little shops full of ruffled dresses and car parts.  There is a well-stocked hubcab salesman up the block, his wares sparkling in the early afternoon sun. People are outdoors, walking their dogs, shopping, washing their cars, eating at the Mexican cafe. A man plays a clarinet on the next corner. The limousine pauses and a girl on roller blades sweeps by, an old man with a shopping cart full of oranges stops to salute us.

This is The Tour. The hearse drives past places that were notable in the life of the deceased. It seems a curious custom to drive the body around when the soul has gone, a detail rather pointedly overlooked.  We will not be going down into South Central L.A. despite Ma’s years there. We have stopped outside Pioneer Chicken. My husband remembers going there with his mother, but apparently we have paused only for a bus.  We can just make out the little strip mall that is home to Point Dume as we speed through the intersection, our passage eased by off-duty L.A.P.D. motorcycle cops.

The cortege turns down Russell, inching along the narrow street.  People have stopped on the street to stare. A little boy is waving to us from his mother’s arms.  The Sikhs who live across the street have come out to stand in their driveway. I would like to think that they do this to honor their fiercely independent neighbor, but probably they are just curious.  Ma is grinning out at them from her picture in the back of the El Camino.

The Wah Wing Sang Funeral Director has gotten out of the hearse and is opening the rear door. The neighbors find this riveting. The women in Ma’s house have opened the front and back doors. The porch light still burns as it has since her death and will for three more days. The funeral director lifts the black wreath from the front door and takes it down the steps to the hearse.  He closes the hearse door, the women close the door of the house, and we move on, back down to Sunset Boulevard, past the Brown Derby,  out to Forest Lawn. Ma has said her last goodbyes.

Forest Lawn is a burial ground peculiar to Hollywood. Checkerboards of green grass and bronze tablets roll acre after acre, relieved occasionally by neoclassical statuary. The cathedral on the summit features reproductions of famous paintings, and a rose window borrowed from some actual cathedral/ Marilyn Monroe married Joe DiMaggio here.  Scale models of famous churches spring from the landscape like movie sets, not quite real. The very wealthy are permitted a copy of some 19th century marble sculpture to accent the final resting place. Otherwise the grave is marked by a square bronze plaque, one of many thousands, and the family is given a map to find it.

Ma’s spot is just to the right of the Court of David, an enclave usually inhabited by a reproduction of Michelangelo’s most famous boy, but the statue is missing. A placard says it’s in for repairs after the 1993 earthquake.

The Wah Wing Sang staff are pulling flowers from the exaggerated arrangements and handing a single blossom to each mourner. Julian begins to eat the petals from a rose. Green canvas chairs ring the grave site. Amidst the multitude of flowers, the scene looks strangely like a garden party. The chairs are spread out over the bronze tablets of somebody else’s loved ones.

We are lined up, again in precise order, to be seated. Behind us the others are left to stand. I unpin the black band from the art of Julian’s jacket. The floral arrangements, now somewhat bedraggled, have been propped up against a stone wall. One of the orchids is missing from ours and most of the roses.

The Minister arrives in his Cadillac, and hurries over to the grave. We obediently bow our heads for prayer and I whisper little poems to Julian to keep him still. The funeral director steps forward to guide us through these rituals. A plump Chinese man in a pale grey silk suit, he reminds me of the pigeons that roost in our barn.

The older brothers and their wives trail past the grave, dropping in arm bands and yarn bows. There seems to be some confusion as to whether these are to be tossed into the grave underneath or placed in the carpet of flowers that covers the casket. Irene trips. Our turn comes to let the black ribbons flutter to the earth, followed by our single blossoms and my white-bowed bobby pin. We let fall the green bows of Elmer’s absent daughters and return to our places in the line.

The family is directed to turn our backs to the coffin as it is lowered into the ground. This will be a topic of discussion at the Ocean Seafood Restaurant afterward; no one remembers this as tradition. Perhaps it is a tradition of the funeral home. I watch the eyes of the other mourners looking back at us, at the casket beyond.  The wintry sun filters through tree leaves, casting dappled light over friends and family.  We hear pulleys squeaking and a muffled thud. The director invites us to turn back. Each child of Rose Louie Lieu and each child’s beloved and each child’s child takes a handful of earth and casts it into the grave.

So she is laid in the earth. Forever to her left is the husband with whom she shared a cantankerous marriage marked by year-long silences and punctuated with slamming doors. To her right, a Japanese child who lived for just a week.

Back at the house on Russell Avenue we drink purified water and eat brown sugar candy. May stayed up late boiling the water being ladled out of a stainless bowl. It tastes terrible, dead and flat.  We drink the water to replace the tears we have shed, we eat the candy to mask the bitterness of our loss.

The funeral banquet is in Chinatown, in a Hong Kong emporium called The Ocean Seafood. Hong Kong style restaurants are notable for their plush ambience, an abundance of chandeliers and rosewood. The food is only a secondary consideration. Many of the mourners have arrived before us. They have seated themselves at the big round tables and are drinking Coca-Cola and 7-Up. Every table has a two-liter bottle of each. All Chinese banquets begin with Coca-Cola and 7-Up. Never Pepsi.

I am sitting at a table near the back, holding Julian on my lap, waiting for my husband to bring a high chair. Tony arrives with his entourage, which now includes eight more of the Guatemalan in-laws who crowd their three-room house in Eagle Rock.

“We are sitting here,” he says. “Find somewhere else.”

I get up from the table, saying nothing, thinking black thoughts about his piggish behavior. By the time Elmer shakes himself free from aunties and cousins and appears without the high chair, I am teary-eyed and angry, ready to leave. We find seats at a table with Norris and Irene. Hahn-gahn mo is sitting there also with another old and honorable lady.  They are beaming at the baby. She has forgotten or forgiven the snub at the funeral parlor. The old ladies don’t speak English, but they converse beautifully with Julian in laughter and gesture and exclamation.

I learned later Hahn-gahn mo is the second wife of Hahn-gahn, who grew up with Pon Lieu and was treated as a brother. Hahn-gahn had two sons from his first marriage. The elder son died prematurely, his widow is Hahn-gahn mo’s friend and loyal companion. The younger son, Selt-Moy, refused to acknowledge his father’s second wife, treating her cruelly, as if she were no more than a concubine. The argument is buried now with the men,  and Hahn-gahn mo has her own children for comfort.

There are two men at the table, each a son of the ladies.

“These are my cousins, Wing and Tommy,” Elmer introduces us. All Lieus are cousins. The Western spelling of the name has no bearing on the relationship. Lu, Liu, Lieu, Loo, they are all of one Chinese character, a complicated arrangement of pitched brush strokes.

After dinner, over tea and oranges, we talk about funeral traditions. Wing, who has been back to China, says that many of the customs are no longer observed there. Imported some sixty years ago by immigrants, the old ways have been preserved like treasures.

We will stay in her house tonight, with Ma at rest, it will be permitted. We eat leftover rice and talk into the night with May and Wayne. There is discussion about more arrangements– which Chinese newspapers should carry the announcement, whether Tony will be there on Monday to bring more flowers to the grave. May talks about the old ways, the years in China. As she talks, she suddenly seems very far away, remembering a time and place unknown to all of us. She speaks of living alone with her mother, of her father’s many arrivals and departures, of going away to school, and the much awaited trip to America.

She tells us about the missing brother, how word had come to her late on a spring night, a message that he had died.

“He was a nice  boy,” she said, lingering on nice, drawing it out. “He was always laughing.  His name was Gong. It means light.” She sips her tea. Mother had a photograph of him that she kept in the bottom of her drawer. I used to sneak in to look at it. She must have known because one day it wasn’t there anymore. I don’t know what became of it.”

The next morning, sifting through the papers of Pon Lieu, the union cards and old insurance policies, we find the photograph. It is sepia tone of a family: a solemn young man, his fiercely beautiful wife, a little girl, perhaps seven, in wrinkled stockings, a little boy about five dressed all in white. In the center of the picture, propped on a pedestal by his father, is the child Gong. In the photograph he wears a pale silk suit and little leather shoes. Theres tiny ivory bracelet on his wrist, his attention is caught by something to the right, something unseen by everyone else.

The photograph was taken in 1932. Gong lived three more years, and his death left wounds that would never heal. His mother was expecting another baby as they struggled to keep Gong alive.  The baby was born dead a few weeks after Gong died, and Ma was broken in a way that never could be mended.

On Monday, the third day of mourning, we meet at Forest Lawn. The sisters have two pots of pink azaleas. One is for Ma’s grave, the other for the grave of Pon Lieu, so he will not be annoyed.  The elaborate floral arrangements have been piled on the grave, easels akimbo. The ribbons flutter in the wind.  It’s forty degrees in Los Angeles this morning and we are chilled in the pale sunshine. Rose and May nestle the azaleas into place and Rose’s husband, Steve, a retired clergyman, says a prayer over the graves.

After all the eulogies, no one has acknowledged the formidable strength and simple, lovely grace of a woman who breathed life into the souls of nine children, who flourished in two worlds, who lit up a room with laughter. Slipping the blue bow out of my hair, I toss it down among the scattered flowers.

“Now is the time for red ribbons,” May says. The Chinese red of good luck and celebration. The ribbon is tucked in a lock of hair above my left ear. The red of poppies. The red of blood. I take my son’s hand and we walk to the car.